MechWarrior: Living Legends Banner
News:
Poll
Question: How would you rate the new Vulture Hybrid Design?
Sucks
No Good
Fine
Great
Awesomesauce

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8
  Print  
Author Topic: Vulture Hybrid Revealed!  (Read 15314 times)
onefistedboxer
Bondsman
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 17


View Profile
« Reply #90 on: April 14, 2008, 03:21:54 PM »

I think the entire legs and feet of the CBT version should be kept, but i have to say i really like the new arms.  If it was my decision i would be tempted to make the arms interchangeable for different variants.
Logged
Aurora Paradox
Lance Sergeant
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 248


Clan Smoke Jaguar - Alpha Star - Star Colonel


View Profile WWW
« Reply #91 on: April 14, 2008, 04:54:28 PM »

I think the entire legs and feet of the CBT version should be kept, but i have to say i really like the new arms.  If it was my decision i would be tempted to make the arms interchangeable for different variants.

That would be a good compromise IMO.

Aurora Paradox
Logged

Chaoswolf
Lance Sergeant
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 186



View Profile
« Reply #92 on: April 22, 2008, 09:44:24 PM »

EDIT

Hhehehe i was confused. bravo on the good looking hybrid, i tend to lean against the pod version though.... it breaks a lot of lore, and made several authors mad when they used it for Mech4
« Last Edit: April 22, 2008, 09:46:21 PM by Chaoswolf » Logged

ITS 'Mech not Mech... you see that damned thing in front?! USE IT.... 'Mech is shortened from BATTLEMECH.... i hate u all... HA!
IgnisTemper
Bondsman
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 40



View Profile
« Reply #93 on: April 22, 2008, 10:52:49 PM »

I must be the only one that prefers the MW4 model Sad

The overall design of the MW4 model just reminds me of the apache attack chopper, don't ask me why, I can't really explain it. 
Logged
ToeBall
Code Monkey One
Lead Dev
Star Colonel
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 956



View Profile
« Reply #94 on: April 22, 2008, 11:14:52 PM »

Probably because it's squat, wide, and boxy with stubby winglets that are only useful as weapons mounts.
Logged
TheEnigma
Lance Sergeant
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 224



View Profile
« Reply #95 on: April 23, 2008, 03:33:37 PM »

Probably because it's squat, wide, and boxy with stubby winglets that are only useful as weapons mounts.

Yep, that's probably the best summary of the MW4 vulture I've ever heard.
Logged

TheANIMAL
Lance Sergeant
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 135


Marcus Nicholls


View Profile WWW
« Reply #96 on: April 24, 2008, 04:55:42 AM »

Has there been any more development on the vulture recently?
Logged

AoP
Web Admin & Community Manager
Lead Dev
Living Legend
*
Online Online

Posts: 1778



View Profile WWW
« Reply #97 on: April 24, 2008, 06:16:43 AM »

Has there been any more development on the vulture recently?

No and there won't be either, at least not in the near future. The current poll situation suggests that a significant majority either likes it as it is or will learn to live with it. We'll rather finish the remaining vehicles than getting stuck on polishing a single one.
Logged


=================
With children use force, with men reason; such is the natural order of things. The wise man requires no law.
Jean-Jaques Rousseau
==================
siodseraph
Guest
« Reply #98 on: April 24, 2008, 06:30:30 AM »

I do like the model more now that I looked at it for a while. Keep it and work on the other stuff instead. I think we can all get along with it! And maybe this can be some sort of MWLL branding on the mechs.
Logged
Kokorochan
Bondsman
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1


View Profile
« Reply #99 on: May 21, 2008, 10:20:03 PM »

First impression is good, but further comparison to the originals is borderline.
What I liked: The new approach with the arms and quad lasers. The under-nose turret. The Arm joint, where arm meets torso. The legs. The feet texture.
What I didn't like: The rocketpods, the MW4 design looks more futuristic. Lack of texture mid-nose. Ankle looks unbelievably weak. Angle between front toes, more like the CBT. 
Logged
Hitman xXx
Bondsman
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 18


Fear-Less


View Profile
« Reply #100 on: May 28, 2008, 07:06:49 AM »

I'm a old die hard fan, I like the old type of Vulture. No under torso turret, like what u seen from the old MW3 game and in the cartoon of old Battletech. Was a bit off when MW4 came out with the new vulture, they tryed to update a old mech that already look good and failed.

I say with the new one looks cool, but make it a new mech in the med class as that what it looks like.
« Last Edit: May 28, 2008, 07:10:10 AM by Hitman xXx » Logged

Mercenary never die we go to hell the regroup.
Thanatos_23
Bondsman
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 22



View Profile
« Reply #101 on: July 03, 2008, 01:59:49 AM »

Ok i think it looks fine as a hybrid, it gives it its own mwll appeal and besides, it still has all the nasty weapons anyway, so people will still think twice about tangoing with it. and what is with people saying the mw4 looks too futuristic.......the whole BT universe is futuristic..thats the whole point
Logged

"As we admire some, there are those we despise. Our hatred for the Draconis Combine is simple and requires little explanation. They plumbed the depths of depravity when they murdered our families to bring us to our knees. We will never grant them mercy or expect it."

--- General Armstrong, ELH Combat Training School
Commencement Ceremonies of 3024
Exanimous
MechWarrior
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 53


View Profile
« Reply #102 on: July 03, 2008, 01:56:52 PM »

I think the problem with many designs that try to strike a balance is that they strike a balance in the wrong sense of the word. I think it would be better if the two designs weren't melded, but combined. What I mean by this is, avoid striking the balance between, lets say, the gunpod arm or a laser like gun arm, or an arch type foot or chicken type foot, and leave these individual components alone, but combine them with the other components. Leave the elements as they are and determine which is best of each. Maybe that design would work? For example, take the missile launcher pods of the mw2 mad dog/vulture and replace it with the mw4 one, but take the mw4 gun pod and replace it with the mw2 one, etc. That way, get the best of both worlds without sacrificing the individuality of each of the components.
Logged
Thanatos_23
Bondsman
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 22



View Profile
« Reply #103 on: July 06, 2008, 09:40:22 PM »

hmm, that sounds like it might work too. either way is fine by me.
Logged

"As we admire some, there are those we despise. Our hatred for the Draconis Combine is simple and requires little explanation. They plumbed the depths of depravity when they murdered our families to bring us to our knees. We will never grant them mercy or expect it."

--- General Armstrong, ELH Combat Training School
Commencement Ceremonies of 3024
Valaska
Bondsman
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1


View Profile
« Reply #104 on: July 15, 2008, 07:49:46 PM »

I say stick with the original one, or the new one.. The hybrid's arms just look wrong, there's no other 'Mech that has arms that look liek that at all..
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Metallic Abyss Theme by SMFers
Powered by SMF 1.1.7 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC
Joomla Bridge by JoomlaHacks.com
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!