MechWarrior: Living Legends Banner
News:
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Circle of Equals (Official Definition)  (Read 812 times)
Aurora Paradox
Lance Sergeant
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 248


Clan Smoke Jaguar - Alpha Star - Star Colonel


View Profile WWW
« on: May 06, 2008, 05:23:27 PM »

OK I have a rough understanding of what it is.  However was hoping one of our resident self proclaimed battletech experts could give me an official definition.  I've already check the battletech wikis and google.

Thanks,

Aurora Paradox
Logged

Chaoswolf
Lance Sergeant
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 186



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: May 06, 2008, 06:24:36 PM »

right O.... gimi a bit to scavenge for info outa the books
Logged

ITS 'Mech not Mech... you see that damned thing in front?! USE IT.... 'Mech is shortened from BATTLEMECH.... i hate u all... HA!
Chaoswolf
Lance Sergeant
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 186



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: May 06, 2008, 06:33:46 PM »

circle of equals: The circle is an area that the combat occurs in while peer warriors encircle the perimeter. During the trial no warrior can enter the circle of equals. The circle is usually a circle or sphere that has a radius of about five to ten meters for melee combat, two to five kilometers for ‘mech combat and about a hundred kilometers for aerospace combat. The circle of equals ensures no non-combatants are caught in the conflict, and in larger battles, there is no collateral damage to surrounding building and equipment.

frankly the circle of equals is just that, a circle of your peers dictating the area of engagement. Break it and you forfeit the trial (whatever that may be).
Logged

ITS 'Mech not Mech... you see that damned thing in front?! USE IT.... 'Mech is shortened from BATTLEMECH.... i hate u all... HA!
Aurora Paradox
Lance Sergeant
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 248


Clan Smoke Jaguar - Alpha Star - Star Colonel


View Profile WWW
« Reply #3 on: May 06, 2008, 06:46:07 PM »

Thank you.  Correct me I'm wrong but it was also a place where a lower ranking warrior and a higher ranking warrior could speak on equal terms?

Aurora Paradox
Logged

Chaoswolf
Lance Sergeant
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 186



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: May 06, 2008, 07:42:55 PM »

if speak as in with fists then yes... mostly its used only for trials, i haven't heard of such a use before....
Logged

ITS 'Mech not Mech... you see that damned thing in front?! USE IT.... 'Mech is shortened from BATTLEMECH.... i hate u all... HA!
SquareSphere
Bondsman
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 27


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: May 15, 2008, 01:15:00 PM »

It's often used when a subordinate challenges the orders or view point of their superior.

Logged
xNeoThoRx
Bondsman
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 46



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: October 24, 2008, 11:54:24 AM »

I use to love COE's and TOE's

Good old days..
Logged

NEW MULTI GAME LEAGUE COMING SOON
Vengeance Gaming League˛
www.vgl2.com
Mavajo
Bondsman
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 14


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: November 14, 2008, 08:15:39 AM »

COE's seemed to have gone into decline a bit after the invasion.  IIRC, there are frequent examples of superiors denying COE's to their inferiors, usually on the grounds that the challenger is in no way their equal.  There are also a number of examples of commanders completely prohibiting them, usually on the grounds that the Clan had already suffered too much attrition because of combat and couldn't afford to lose any more able-bodied warriors.

Usually the narration mentions that these denials of COE's were considered outside of protocol and a bit controversial - that seems to imply to me that COE's were pretty much always accepted before the invasion, but the integrity of the Clans degarded some during and after the invasion
Logged
xNeoThoRx
Bondsman
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 46



View Profile
« Reply #8 on: November 15, 2008, 09:51:28 PM »

COE's seemed to have gone into decline a bit after the invasion.  IIRC, there are frequent examples of superiors denying COE's to their inferiors, usually on the grounds that the challenger is in no way their equal.  There are also a number of examples of commanders completely prohibiting them, usually on the grounds that the Clan had already suffered too much attrition because of combat and couldn't afford to lose any more able-bodied warriors.

Usually the narration mentions that these denials of COE's were considered outside of protocol and a bit controversial - that seems to imply to me that COE's were pretty much always accepted before the invasion, but the integrity of the Clans degarded some during and after the invasion

lol mav

I only did 2 COE's in my time.  I challenged my good buddy Bailey17 (who trained me) and lost.. lol

The 2nd guy.. I cannot remember but I won and took his rank.

I was better than alot of my superiors back in my Clan days.  But I had alot of respect for them as leaders.
Logged

NEW MULTI GAME LEAGUE COMING SOON
Vengeance Gaming League˛
www.vgl2.com
Mavajo
Bondsman
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 14


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: November 17, 2008, 07:37:32 AM »

You probably knew this anyway, but my post was in reference to the novels.
Logged
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Metallic Abyss Theme by SMFers
Powered by SMF 1.1.7 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC
Joomla Bridge by JoomlaHacks.com
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!